The Hangzhou auto purchase drama finally opened after a year-long “warm-up period”. On the evening of March 25, the Hangzhou Municipal People’s Government issued the “Circular on Implementation of Regulation and Management of the Total Passenger Cars”. The document stipulates that the total amount of minibuses shall be controlled and “displaced from the peak” in the whole city starting from 02:00 on March 26, 2014. The dual management of the purchase quota must be obtained through a shake or bid.

On the morning of the announcement, some media reporters called the Hangzhou Traffic Management Bureau. The other party still said that they had not heard of restrictions on purchases. It is hoped that the general public would not listen to the "rumors." According to a survey conducted by the reporter, last year, Hangzhou had reported the purchase of cars for six times, and then the relevant government departments made six rumors.

This side of the government "has been arrogant," and the people there are "robbing the car", 4S shop "promotions busy." When the purchase rumors were the most fierce in March this year, a number of 4S stores in Hangzhou extended the business hours to 12 o'clock in the evening, and some joint-venture brands even had no cars to sell. Some media broke the news. A certain owner of Huangzhou in Hangzhou purchased 125 vans at one time to account for the brand. There are more than 800 cars under its name. “The purchase is not as good as buying first,” “restricting the purchase countdown, robbing the car for xx”... When the “restricted purchase” is resold by the dealer into advertising words for the promotion, the government comes out again and again, only consumers are at the end of the information chain. , was led by the nose again and again.

“My question is whether the government held a hearing before the introduction of the restriction policy?” said Li Ziliang, consulting director of Zero Research Consulting Group’s Automotive Research Center. “As far as I know, most of the cities that were previously restricted are not. Some are only superficial. Work.” Because the government departments and the citizens do not communicate well, we are always worried that the purchase restriction policy will result in a “sudden attack.” Rumors will also have growth and spread, and each time it can trigger “panic consumption”. ". Li Ziliang told reporters: "In the final analysis, the local government still does not have a good role as a service provider."

This year's "two sessions" in the country, regardless of on-site or off-site, "haze fog" are absolute hot words. When scientists are still arguing over who is the real culprit of smog, various local governments have already sharpened their lives and started to buy cars. On July 10 last year, China Automobile Industry Association predicted that Tianjin, Hangzhou and other cities will be limited to purchase, and now two have been made. Who is the next purchase? Is it really only limited to purchase this road for the government to control congestion and environmental pollution?

“Cars in many countries and regions in Europe are higher than China, but traffic congestion and exhaust gas pollution are relatively low. The reason is the improvement of public facilities and the concept of citizens’ transportation.” Zhong Yi, a well-known car critic, believes that buses, The subway should take on the traffic functions of the citizens for daily commuting. The private cars meet the uncertain personalized route. For example, the whole family goes to the outskirts on weekends. In China, private cars have too much of the function of the former.

Zhong Shi said that to change this situation, government agencies can use "economic leverage" and "ethical propaganda". “It would be better to impose restrictions on private cars in certain core areas of the city instead of implementing tougher car restrictions. For example, for certain scenic spots or certain core business districts, only buses are allowed to enter, restrictions on private cars are imposed, or parking fees are increased. Increasing the cost of vehicles will naturally reduce the public's use of private cars.” Zhong thinks that at the moral level, the government also needs to guide: The public transportation in the city is for all citizens, who have to take public transportation and drive private cars. There are also biking and walking, and not all resources are tilted towards the car.

“There are two reasons for traffic jams in big cities. The first is that the absolute number of cars is too large, and the second is that the population in the main city area is too concentrated.” Li Ziliang believes that the primary purpose of “blocking the blockade” is to develop satellite cities and to vigorously expand the satellite cities and the main cities. The traffic network between urban areas and satellite cities. “Beijing’s satellite city cannot effectively attract the urban population. The most important reason is the inconvenience of transportation. It takes an hour and a half to enter the city from Changping.”

Li Ziliang suggested: “An inter-city high-speed rail can be established between the satellite city and the main downtown area. A hub station will be set up at a commercial center like the International Trade Center, and a direct stop will be achieved with the satellite city. If it can enter the city within 30 minutes, there are certainly many people willing to disperse into the satellite city. Living, you can also reduce the use of private cars. Beijing's recently run 'custom bus' is a good attempt. "At present, many auto companies are actively developing the "intelligent transportation system", people, cars, roads and other transportation elements In a network, computers are used to make overall arrangements to design the optimal travel plan for each car at any time and place, allowing government departments to achieve finer traffic management.

A single crude car purchase is a "lazy government" and it is contagious. “Hangzhou is the sixth city in China to purchase cars, and there are no more than 30 in the future. I don’t doubt it at all.” Li Ziliang stated that the purchase restriction is only a temporary anti-fever medicine for urban management, but if it is not “anti-inflammatory”, The condition will continue to deteriorate. Especially for some second-tier cities and third-tier cities, as long as there is still potential for road construction and public transport to be excavated, it is not easy to pick up the board of administrative measures, and even less to limit purchases and restrictions. Urban congestion is first and foremost a fault of the government. Allowing consumers to pay orders is not only unfair but also not a permanent solution.